SLAPP Lawsuits in Israel: The Historic Precedent in the Inbal Or Case

In recent years, awareness of the phenomenon of SLAPP lawsuits has been growing—legal proceedings whose purpose is not necessarily a genuine resolution of a dispute, but rather creating pressure, deterrence, and harm to freedom of expression.

In one of the most prominent and publicized proceedings in Israel, related to Inbal Or, Tidhar Tzur Co. led a significant precedent in which the SLAPP doctrine was adopted for the first time in Israel—a legal mechanism designed to protect defendants against abusive SLAPP lawsuits.

What is a SLAPP Lawsuit?

A SLAPP lawsuit (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) is a lawsuit filed with the purpose of deterring public, professional, or journalistic criticism by exerting legal and economic pressure on the defendant.

In many cases, the very conduct of the legal proceeding is intended to create a chilling effect and deter individuals from expressing legitimate positions or criticism.

The Precedent in the Inbal Or Case and the Firm’s Role

In the course of the legal proceeding, Tidhar Tzur Co. advanced the position that the use of SLAPP lawsuits as a tool for intimidation or silencing should not be permitted.

The firm’s legal strategy focused on identifying clear indicators of a SLAPP lawsuit, emphasizing the potential harm to freedom of expression, and promoting swift and effective dismissal of the proceeding.

The proceeding concluded with a precedent-setting decision of broad significance for Israeli law and the protection of freedom of expression.

How Can One Respond to a SLAPP Lawsuit?

Proper handling of a SLAPP lawsuit requires deep understanding of defamation law, commercial litigation, and complex dispute management.

Tidhar Tzur Co. represents clients in litigation proceedings and lawsuits with public sensitivity, while striving for swift, discreet, and effective solutions.